Difference between revisions of "Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA"

Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA (view source)

Revision as of 19:17, 6 November 2023

541 bytes removed , 19:17, 6 November 2023

→‎Follow the Money

(username removed)

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 [[File:Elected Judge numbered.png|center|550px|elected judge]]
 </blockquote>
-As shown above, [1] campaign donors contribute money to an elected judge's campaign, [2] campaign donors then gain influence over the elected judge's decisions and, in turn, the judge caters to the desires of his or her donors. [3] Elected judges then use their campaign funds to influence the voters and the judge is therefore able to increase the likelihood of keeping his or her job in an election. [4] Taxpayer money funds the salary of the elected judge, though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government.
+As shown above, [1] campaign donors contribute money to an elected judge's campaign, [2] campaign donors then gain influence over the elected judge's decisions and, in turn, the judge caters to the desires of his or her donors. [3] The elected judge then uses his or her campaign funds to influence the voters and the judge is therefore able to increase the likelihood of keeping his or her job in an election. [4] Taxpayer money funds the salary of the elected judge, though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government and not the result of a judge's performance on the bench.
 ====Part-Time (Hourly) Senior Judges====
@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 [1] Campaign donors contribute money to an elected judge's campaign.
-[2] Campaign donors then gain influence over the elected judge's decisions and, in turn, the judge caters to the desires of his or her donors.
+[2] Campaign donors, by virtue of their donations, gain influence over the elected judge's decisions and, in turn, the judge caters to the desires of his or her donors.
-[3] Elected judges use their campaign funds to influence the voters and the judge is therefore able to increase the likelihood of keeping his or her job in an election.
+[3] The elected judge then uses his or her campaign funds to influence the voters and the judge is therefore able to increase the likelihood of keeping his or her job in an election.
-[4] Taxpayer money funds the salary of the elected judge, though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government.
+[4] Taxpayer money funds the salary of the elected judge, though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government and not the result of a judge's performance on the bench.
 <br>
 <br>
 '''Senior Judge'''<br>
-. The writ of possession ordering that Jackson be evicted from the Property did not include his fiance and children. However, on '''January 12, 2023''', the Fulton County Sheriff Deputies used that writ of possession to remove everyone from the Property including Jackson's fiance and children.
+[5] The elected judge assigns a case to a senior judge.
-. On January 31, 2023, Jackson filed a ''Petition to Quiet Title and Complaint for Breach of Contract'' against the McCrackens, which required the assigned judge to appoint a special master. That case was assigned to Judge Richardson but Judge Richardson never appointed a special master.
+[6] The senior judge is compensated with tax dollars at the hourly rate equal to that of a full-time judge in the same county in which they are presiding; though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government and not the result of a judge's performance on the bench.
-. On '''February 13, 2023''', Judge Richardson voluntarily recused herself from the Quiet Title case but did NOT recuse herself from the eviction case. The Quiet Title case was re-assigned to Judge Krause upon Judge Richardson's recusal.
+[7] The elected judge uses this case assignment power to influence the senior judge and the senior judge, in turn, caters to the desires of the elected judge in order to increase the likelihood of being assigned to cases in the future.
 <br>
 <br>
 '''Mediator'''<br>
-. Judge Krause never appointed a special master in the Quiet Title action.
+[8] The elected judge assigns a case to a mediator (who is often times also a campaign donor and/or a senior judge).
-. On '''February 17, 2023''', Judge Richardson denied Jackson’s motion to recuse Judge Leftridge and the eviction case was then assigned back to Judge Leftridge. Judge Krause then transferred the Quiet Title action to Judge Leftridge on February 24, 2023.
+[9] The parties in the case are ordered to mediation for the purpose of trying to settle the case.
-. On '''March 2, 2023''', Jackson's counsel motioned to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the matter was reassigned to Judge Shukura Ingram. Before Judge Leftridge signed the reassignment order as required by law, she set a hearing on the McCrackens' motion trying to stay the appointment of a special master. That hearing was set to take place on March 10, 2023 before the Honorable Judge Alford Dempsey. However, on '''March 9, 2023''', the Court canceled that hearing in light of the resusal motion pending against Judge Leftridge.
+[10] The parties are ordered to pay the mediator at an hourly rate usually between $150 and $350 per hour.
-. On '''March 10, 2023''', Judge Ingram denied Jackson's motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the case was assigned back to Judge Leftridge.
+[11] The elected judge uses this mediator assignment power to influence the senior judge and the senior judge, in turn, caters to the desires of the elected judge in order to increase the likelihood of being assigned as a mediator in the future.
 </blockquote>