Difference between revisions of "Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues (view source)
Revision as of 13:55, 25 December 2022
, 13:55, 25 December 2022no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The plaintiff, Paramount Properties, receiving what appeared to be an early Christmas present by the court is represented by Hall Booth Smith, an Atlanta law firm with at least one attorney on Judge Leftridge's donor list.<ref>[https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/Campaign/Campaign_ByContributions_RFR.aspx?NameID=16478&FilerID=C2020000293&CDRID=156866&Name=Leftridge,%20Melynee%20&Year=2020&Report=June%2030th%20-%20Election%20Year Campaign Contribution Disclosure Report, June 30, 2020 (R. David Ware, Hall Booth Smith]</ref> | The plaintiff, Paramount Properties, receiving what appeared to be an early Christmas present by the court is represented by Hall Booth Smith, an Atlanta law firm with at least one attorney on Judge Leftridge's donor list.<ref>[https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/Campaign/Campaign_ByContributions_RFR.aspx?NameID=16478&FilerID=C2020000293&CDRID=156866&Name=Leftridge,%20Melynee%20&Year=2020&Report=June%2030th%20-%20Election%20Year Campaign Contribution Disclosure Report, June 30, 2020 (R. David Ware, Hall Booth Smith)]</ref> | ||
(username removed)