Difference between revisions of "Faux Process And Rubber-Stamped Orders"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(username removed)
(username removed)
Line 8: Line 8:
(4) The judge then signs the order without scrutiny (presumably without reading it), thus awarding the drafting party the remedies improperly inserted into the proposed order by the prevailing party's attorney.<br>
(4) The judge then signs the order without scrutiny (presumably without reading it), thus awarding the drafting party the remedies improperly inserted into the proposed order by the prevailing party's attorney.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
That case in Muscogee County was not the first time I witnessed a party denied due process with a rubber-stamped order, nor was it the last. In fact, my first recollection of such injustice occurred at the hands of a Cobb County State Court judge, the Honorable Carl W. Bowers, and my most recent experience was at the hands of a Cobb County Superior Court senior judge, the Honorable G. Grant Brantley.
The case in Muscogee County was not the first time I witnessed a party denied due process with a rubber-stamped order, nor was it the last. In fact, my first recollection of such injustice occurred at the hands of a Cobb County State Court judge, the Honorable Carl W. Bowers, and my most recent experience was at the hands of a Cobb County Superior Court senior judge, the Honorable G. Grant Brantley.
<br>
<br>
=Passing The Buck=
=Passing The Buck=
(username removed)

Navigation menu