Difference between revisions of "Faux Process And Rubber-Stamped Orders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(4) The judge then signs the order without scrutiny (presumably without reading it), thus awarding the drafting party the remedies improperly inserted into the proposed order by the prevailing party's attorney.<br> | (4) The judge then signs the order without scrutiny (presumably without reading it), thus awarding the drafting party the remedies improperly inserted into the proposed order by the prevailing party's attorney.<br> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
The case in Muscogee County was not the first time I witnessed a party denied due process with a rubber-stamped order, nor was it the last. In fact, my first recollection of such injustice occurred at the hands of a Cobb County State Court judge, the Honorable Carl W. Bowers, and my most recent experience was at the hands of a Cobb County Superior Court senior judge, the Honorable G. Grant Brantley. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
=Passing The Buck= | =Passing The Buck= |
(username removed)