Difference between revisions of "Faux Process And Rubber-Stamped Orders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
That case in Muscogee County was not the first time I witnessed a party fall victim to a rubber-stamped order nor was it the last. In fact, my first recollection of such injustice occurred at the hands of Judge Carl W. Bowers, and my most recent experience was at the hands of Judge G. Grant Brantley. The rubber-stamped order is perhaps the most dangerous weapon used by judges in civil cases to successfully circumvent due process. | That case in Muscogee County was not the first time I witnessed a party fall victim to a rubber-stamped order nor was it the last. In fact, my first recollection of such injustice occurred at the hands of Judge Carl W. Bowers, and my most recent experience was at the hands of Judge G. Grant Brantley. The rubber-stamped order is perhaps the most dangerous weapon used by judges in civil cases to successfully circumvent due process. "If you don't like it, you can appeal," as Brantley would say. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
=Passing The Buck= | =Passing The Buck= | ||
(username removed)