Difference between revisions of "Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA (view source)

Revision as of 18:38, 6 November 2023

1,430 bytes removed ,  18:38, 6 November 2023
→‎The Big Picture
(username removed)
(username removed)
Line 68: Line 68:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
[[File:Full Diagram numbered.png|center|800px|elected judge]]
[[File:Full Diagram numbered.png|center|800px|elected judge]]
1. On '''September 13, 2022''', counsel for Jackson filed a ''Demand for Jury Trial'' into the eviction case with Paramount.
'''Elected Judge'''
[1] Campaign donors contribute money to an elected judge's campaign.


2. On October 21, 2022, Judge Leftridge's staff attorney informed the parties through email that there would not be a court reporter for the jury trial scheduled to take place on October 25, 2022 and that the Court would not delay the trial even if the parties could not secure their own court reporter. On '''October 24, 2022''', Jackson filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy resulting in an automatic stay of the eviction case.
[2] Campaign donors then gain influence over the elected judge's decisions and, in turn, the judge caters to the desires of his or her donors.


3. After the Bankruptcy stay was lifted, Paramount filed a motion for an immediate writ of possession ("eviction") and for the release of all funds that were in the Registry of the Court, which was estimated to be just over $115,000. Judge Leftridge's staff attorney informed the parties on December 21, 2022 that the Court was going to issue an order on Paramount's motion, which had only been filed the evening before, December 20, 2022. On '''December 22, 2022''', the parties were served an order signed by Judge Leftridge for an immediate writ of possession against Jackson, the release of the more than $115,000 held in the Registry to Paramount and ordering Jackson to pay $30,000.00 more into the Registry of the Court no later than December 31, 2022. Counsel for Jackson had emailed the Judge's staff attorney earlier that morning only to receive an auto-reply stating that she was on vacation.
[3] Elected judges use their campaign funds to influence the voters and the judge is therefore able to increase the likelihood of keeping his or her job in an election.
 
4. On December 27, 2022, Jackson filed a motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the eviction case. Judge Leftridge signed a reassignment order on '''January 6, 2023''' in light of Jackson's recusal motion and the motion to recuse was subsequently assigned to Judge Richardson.


[4] Taxpayer money funds the salary of the elected judge, though the taxpayers do not have influence over a judge's decisions because taxes are mandated by the government.
<br>
'''Senior Judge'''
5. The writ of possession ordering that Jackson be evicted from the Property did not include his fiance and children. However, on '''January 12, 2023''', the Fulton County Sheriff Deputies used that writ of possession to remove everyone from the Property including Jackson's fiance and children.
5. The writ of possession ordering that Jackson be evicted from the Property did not include his fiance and children. However, on '''January 12, 2023''', the Fulton County Sheriff Deputies used that writ of possession to remove everyone from the Property including Jackson's fiance and children.


Line 81: Line 83:


7. On '''February 13, 2023''', Judge Richardson voluntarily recused herself from the Quiet Title case but did NOT recuse herself from the eviction case. The Quiet Title case was re-assigned to Judge Krause upon Judge Richardson's recusal.  
7. On '''February 13, 2023''', Judge Richardson voluntarily recused herself from the Quiet Title case but did NOT recuse herself from the eviction case. The Quiet Title case was re-assigned to Judge Krause upon Judge Richardson's recusal.  
 
<br>
'''Mediator'''
8. Judge Krause never appointed a special master in the Quiet Title action.
8. Judge Krause never appointed a special master in the Quiet Title action.


Line 89: Line 92:


11. On '''March 10, 2023''', Judge Ingram denied Jackson's motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the case was assigned back to Judge Leftridge.
11. On '''March 10, 2023''', Judge Ingram denied Jackson's motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the case was assigned back to Judge Leftridge.
12. After refusing to appoint a special master in the Quiet Title action and considering other facts giving rise to an appearance of impropriety, Jackson filed a ''Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition'' against the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench of judges. That matter is still pending.


</blockquote>
</blockquote>
(username removed)
Retrieved from "https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/index.php/Special:MobileDiff/1571"

Navigation menu