Difference between revisions of "Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA (view source)
Revision as of 08:29, 8 October 2023
, 08:29, 8 October 2023→Recusal Cover Fire
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Recusal Cover Fire== | ==Recusal Cover Fire== | ||
On April 2, 2023, Navigating Justice published an article entitled | On April 2, 2023, Navigating Justice published an article entitled [https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/index.php?title=Georgia_Ethics_Code_Does_Not_Apply_To_Fulton_Judges ''Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges''] discussing the Fulton County judiciary's refusal to recuse Judge Melynee Leftridge from presiding over multiple cases where Judge Leftridge showed clear bias, conflicts of interest, and plain incompetence. The article explains: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
There are two ways a judge can be recused (or "removed") from a case: (1) voluntarily and (2) involuntarily. The latter, at least in Fulton County, occurs amongst flying pigs and unicorns. Jackson's case has extracted that fact pretty clearly. | There are two ways a judge can be recused (or "removed") from a case: (1) voluntarily and (2) involuntarily. The latter, at least in Fulton County, occurs amongst flying pigs and unicorns. Jackson's case has extracted that fact pretty clearly. | ||
(username removed)