Difference between revisions of "Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(username removed)
Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit
(username removed)
Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit
Line 54: Line 54:


=A Short-Sided Swan Song=
=A Short-Sided Swan Song=
The Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct ("CJC") prohibits not just impropriety but, rather, the CJC bars the mere "appearance of impropriety."<ref>[https://casetext.com/rule/georgia-court-rules/georgia-code-of-judicial-conduct/canons/canon-1-judges-shall-uphold-the-independence-integrity-and-impartiality-of-the-judiciary-and-shall-avoid-impropriety-and-the-appearance-of-impropriety-in-all-of-their-activities/rule-12-promoting-public-confidence-in-the-judiciary#:~:text=The%20test%20for%20appearance%20of,impartiality%2C%20and%20competence%20is%20impaired. CJC Rule 1.2]</ref> And here, it certainly ''appears'' that Senior Judges (Grubbs and Schuster) are being used to do the dirty work of the underlying elected judges (Leftridge and Leonard), though without facing the consequences of having to fight for re-election as the elected judge would. So what changed (if anything) that transformed these once highly regarded Cobb County judicial leaders into mere henchmen of the Fulton County establishment?  
It ''appears'' that heavily distinguished and once well respected Cobb County judges (Grubbs and Brantley) have abandoned their principals and have willingly taken on the task of enabling the Fulton injustice system at the expense of their own good names. But why? What changed (if anything) that transformed these once highly regarded Cobb County judicial leaders into mere henchmen of the Fulton County establishment?  
<br>
<br>
The most obvious prevails: '''How they make their money.'''
The most obvious prevails: '''How they make their money.'''
(username removed)

Navigation menu