Difference between revisions of "Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA (view source)
Revision as of 00:13, 7 October 2023
, 00:13, 7 October 2023→Appearance Is Everything
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
But why would Judge Grubbs appoint a special master whose ethics have been so severely questioned that he is barred from serving as a judge in the State of Georgia? | But why would Judge Grubbs appoint a special master whose ethics have been so severely questioned that he is barred from serving as a judge in the State of Georgia? | ||
= | =A Short-Sided Swan Song= | ||
The Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct ("CJC") prohibits not just impropriety but, rather, the CJC bars the mere "appearance of impropriety."<ref>[https://casetext.com/rule/georgia-court-rules/georgia-code-of-judicial-conduct/canons/canon-1-judges-shall-uphold-the-independence-integrity-and-impartiality-of-the-judiciary-and-shall-avoid-impropriety-and-the-appearance-of-impropriety-in-all-of-their-activities/rule-12-promoting-public-confidence-in-the-judiciary#:~:text=The%20test%20for%20appearance%20of,impartiality%2C%20and%20competence%20is%20impaired. CJC Rule 1.2]</ref> And here, it certainly ''appears'' that Senior Judges (Grubbs and Schuster) are being used to do the dirty work of the underlying elected judges (Leftridge and Leonard), though without facing the consequences of having to fight for re-election as the elected judge would. By design, it is all a ''facade'' and we are left with but one solution: '''Hold the elected judges accountable for the acts of their Senior Judges.''' | The Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct ("CJC") prohibits not just impropriety but, rather, the CJC bars the mere "appearance of impropriety."<ref>[https://casetext.com/rule/georgia-court-rules/georgia-code-of-judicial-conduct/canons/canon-1-judges-shall-uphold-the-independence-integrity-and-impartiality-of-the-judiciary-and-shall-avoid-impropriety-and-the-appearance-of-impropriety-in-all-of-their-activities/rule-12-promoting-public-confidence-in-the-judiciary#:~:text=The%20test%20for%20appearance%20of,impartiality%2C%20and%20competence%20is%20impaired. CJC Rule 1.2]</ref> And here, it certainly ''appears'' that Senior Judges (Grubbs and Schuster) are being used to do the dirty work of the underlying elected judges (Leftridge and Leonard), though without facing the consequences of having to fight for re-election as the elected judge would. By design, it is all a ''facade'' and we are left with but one solution: '''Hold the elected judges accountable for the acts of their Senior Judges.''' | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
May 1, 2023 | May 1, 2023 | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
(username removed)