Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 09:49, 31 March 2023
, 09:49, 31 March 2023→The Courthouse Shell Game
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
On March 23, 2023, Derrick Jackson filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the judges (including Judge Leftridge) failed to recuse themselves from the eviction case despite conflicts, two judges (one in the eviction case and one in the Quiet Title case) refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master, who's appointment is mandated by Georgia law in the Quiet Title case. To illustrate how the circumventing of checks and balances is done by Superior Court Judges, Navigating Justice developed the following chart based on court documents in Jackson's cases highlighting the key players and their respective roles: | On March 23, 2023, Derrick Jackson filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the judges (including Judge Leftridge) failed to recuse themselves from the eviction case despite conflicts, two judges (one in the eviction case and one in the Quiet Title case) refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master, who's appointment is mandated by Georgia law in the Quiet Title case. To illustrate how the circumventing of checks and balances is done by Superior Court Judges, Navigating Justice developed the following chart based on court documents in Jackson's cases highlighting the key players and their respective roles: | ||
<blockquote> | |||
1. | 1. | ||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
12. | 12. | ||
</blockquote> | |||
Based on the above, the actions (or inactions) taken (or not taken) by the Fulton County Superior Court judges and their subordinates are consistent with gaining and maintaining the most control over the outcome of the case, which is inconsistent with their duty to remain neutral and impartial. If they were neutral and impartial, they would have no interest in controlling the narrative--but they are certainly fighting hard to, VERY hard. | Based on the above, the actions (or inactions) taken (or not taken) by the Fulton County Superior Court judges and their subordinates are consistent with gaining and maintaining the most control over the outcome of the case, which is inconsistent with their duty to remain neutral and impartial. If they were neutral and impartial, they would have no interest in controlling the narrative--but they are certainly fighting hard to, VERY hard. | ||
(username removed)