Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 15:44, 28 March 2023
, 15:44, 28 March 2023→Looks Like Mortgage Fraud, Smells Like Mortgage Fraud
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Looks Like Mortgage Fraud, Smells Like Mortgage Fraud== | ==Looks Like Mortgage Fraud, Smells Like Mortgage Fraud== | ||
It'd be easy to write this | It'd be easy to write this all off as an act of "greed" in light of a ''hot'' real estate market. But Navigating Justice's investigative team has uncovered information that paints a much different, darker picture. Here's what we know: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
1. On May 17, 2020, Derrick Jackson entered into a | 1. On May 17, 2020, Derrick Jackson entered into a | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
5. In light of the above, as of October 1, 2020, the McCrackens had roughly $130,000 in payments from Derrick Jackson. | 5. In light of the above, as of October 1, 2020, the McCrackens had roughly $130,000 in payments from Derrick Jackson. | ||
6. On October 20, 2020, the McCrackens purchased a home for $630,000 with a down payment of $130,000, roughly the amount gained from Jackson for the sale agreement. | 6. On October 20, 2020, the McCrackens purchased a home for $630,000 with a down payment of $130,000, roughly the total amount gained from Jackson for the sale agreement. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
In light of the above, it is crystal clear that $130,000 paid by Derrick Jackson was reinvested by McCracken for the sale of real estate, and then $45,000 in 2021 | In light of the above, it is crystal clear that $130,000 paid by Derrick Jackson was reinvested by McCracken for the sale of Florida real estate, and then the $45,000 in 2021 that should have gone toward property taxes went toward the purchase of a Mercedes Benz. All the while McCracken claimed that he owed Bank of America $1.8 million, which Jackson came later to find out was $300,000 more than the debt amount shown on the Security Deed for the Property ($1.52 million). | ||
All that being said, what at first glance appeared to be the result of simple greed, turns out to be an act of necessity. The McCrackens as a matter of fact cannot catch up on their mortgage unless they sell to a fresh buyer for the full price. | All that being said, what at first glance appeared to be the result of simple greed, turns out to be an act of necessity. The McCrackens as a matter of fact cannot catch up on their mortgage unless they sell to a fresh buyer for the full price. Thus, they have no choice but to renege on their contract with Jackson making a "staged" eviction their only chance out of debt with the mortgage company. And with the help of the Fulton County Superior Court bench, the McCrackens may very well succeed. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
(username removed)