Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 15:11, 25 March 2023
, 15:11, 25 March 2023→The Courthouse Shell Game
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==The Courthouse Shell Game== | ==The Courthouse Shell Game== | ||
There are two ways a judge can be recused ( | There are two ways a judge can be recused (or “removed”) from a case: (1) voluntarily and (2) involuntarily. The latter of the two, at least in Fulton County, occurs amongst unicorns and flying pigs. Jackson’s case has extracted that fact pretty clearly. | ||
After three motions to recuse Judge Leftridge from the “staged eviction” case and another motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the companion Quiet Title case, Derrick Jackson filed a Petition for Mandamus demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the Judges refused to recuse themselves from the eviction case, two judges refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master to the case, who's appointment is mandated by Georgia law. Based on the Petition For Writ of Mandamus And Writ of Prohibition, Navigating Justice created the following flow chart of facts and events showing the court’s impropriety: | After three motions to recuse Judge Leftridge from the “staged eviction” case and another motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the companion Quiet Title case, Derrick Jackson filed a Petition for Mandamus demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the Judges refused to recuse themselves from the eviction case, two judges refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master to the case, who's appointment is mandated by Georgia law. Based on the Petition For Writ of Mandamus And Writ of Prohibition, Navigating Justice created the following flow chart of facts and events showing the court’s impropriety: |
(username removed)