Difference between revisions of "Political Adversaries Cut From the Same Cloth"
Political Adversaries Cut From the Same Cloth (view source)
Revision as of 20:44, 15 January 2024
, 15 January→Brantley In Retirement
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
The irony of it all, Brantley’s actions show a complete lack of “judicial restraint”—making him a catalyst and proponent of judicial activism. | The irony of it all, Brantley’s actions show a complete lack of “judicial restraint”—making him a catalyst and proponent of judicial activism. | ||
<br> | |||
''See also'' [https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/c/ce/Let_Paulding_Fly_Recusal_Release-6-11-2015.pdf Let Paulding Fly: Brantley Needs to Step Aside] | |||
So what exactly keeps judges accountable? Is there no safeguard to protect The People from rogues in robes who simply discard the law of the land? In Georgia, that task belongs to the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC). However, as is apparent below, the JQC struggles to be effective. | So what exactly keeps judges accountable? Is there no safeguard to protect The People from rogues in robes who simply discard the law of the land? In Georgia, that task belongs to the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC). However, as is apparent below, the JQC struggles to be effective. | ||
(username removed)