Difference between revisions of "Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues"
Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues (view source)
Revision as of 08:40, 15 November 2023
, 08:40, 15 November 2023no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The plaintiff-landlord (client of Hall Booth Smith) requested from the court a release of all funds held in the Registry at around 5:20 PM on December 20, 2022;<ref>[https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/8/80/Motion_for_Writ_of_Possession_%28Final_With_Exhibits%29.pdf Motion For Immediate Writ of Possession]</ref> and the judge entered the order releasing the funds without a hearing at 11:03 AM the very next morning (on December 21)<ref>[https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/c/c9/Order_For_Writ_2022CV365529.pdf Order Granting Immediate Writ of Possession]</ref> with over $40,000 of those funds still in dispute for a jury to decide ownership of. “I’ve seen my fair share of malfeasance from the bench in multiple [Georgia] counties so, while this situation isn’t overly surprising, it’s still disheartening and puts me in a bad position having to ask the judge to recuse herself,” McMaster continued. “It would essentially amount to malpractice on my part if I don’t motion to recuse the judge at this point.” | The plaintiff-landlord (client of Hall Booth Smith) requested from the court a release of all funds held in the Registry at around 5:20 PM on December 20, 2022;<ref>[https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/8/80/Motion_for_Writ_of_Possession_%28Final_With_Exhibits%29.pdf Motion For Immediate Writ of Possession]</ref> and the judge entered the order releasing the funds without a hearing at 11:03 AM the very next morning (on December 21)<ref>[https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/c/c9/Order_For_Writ_2022CV365529.pdf Order Granting Immediate Writ of Possession]</ref> with over $40,000 of those funds still in dispute for a jury to decide ownership of. “I’ve seen my fair share of malfeasance from the bench in multiple [Georgia] counties so, while this situation isn’t overly surprising, it’s still disheartening and puts me in a bad position having to ask the judge to recuse herself,” McMaster continued. “It would essentially amount to malpractice on my part if I don’t motion to recuse the judge at this point.”<ref>[https://thewikilaw.org/wiki/images/a/a2/Motion_for_Recusal_Leftridge.pdf Motion For Recusal].</ref> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
As for the likelihood that this was a mere calculation error by the judge, “We all know that Judge Leftridge is very detail oriented and essentially a ‘math-whiz’ when she wants to be,” McMaster said--admittedly in reference to Leftridge’s use of arithmetic justifying her reinstatement of Patty Durand as a candidate for the Georgia Public Service Commission, reversing Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s decision to disqualify Durand from the recent election.<ref>More on the facts and circumstances of the Patty Durand case can be found [https://georgiarecorder.com/2022/08/18/superior-court-judge-puts-echols-democratic-psc-challenger-back-on-november-ballot/ here].</ref> | As for the likelihood that this was a mere calculation error by the judge, “We all know that Judge Leftridge is very detail oriented and essentially a ‘math-whiz’ when she wants to be,” McMaster said--admittedly in reference to Leftridge’s use of arithmetic justifying her [https://georgiarecorder.com/2022/08/18/superior-court-judge-puts-echols-democratic-psc-challenger-back-on-november-ballot/ reinstatement of Patty Durand as a candidate] for the Georgia Public Service Commission, reversing Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s decision to disqualify Durand from the recent election.<ref>More on the facts and circumstances of the Patty Durand case can be found [https://georgiarecorder.com/2022/08/18/superior-court-judge-puts-echols-democratic-psc-challenger-back-on-november-ballot/ here].</ref> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
By | By | ||
[[File:Signature wiki law | [[File:Signature wiki law NJ.png|left|256px|Author]]<br><br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
''The problems of judicial impropriety being done for clients of campaign donors are familiar to the author. The pattern of conduct by lawyers and judges that deprives the people of their rights is like that documented in many other cases where families are losing their homes and their children, everything that matters most to them. The law and courts in Georgia, as seen in over ten years of data collected to illustrate this problem, offer little to no protection for those in need of it, our citizens kept in the dark until it’s too late.'' | ''The problems of judicial impropriety being done for clients of campaign donors are familiar to the author. The pattern of conduct by lawyers and judges that deprives the people of their rights is like that documented in many other cases where families are losing their homes and their children, everything that matters most to them. The law and courts in Georgia, as seen in over ten years of data collected to illustrate this problem, offer little to no protection for those in need of it, our citizens kept in the dark until it’s too late.'' | ||
| Line 43: | Line 42: | ||
Last Updated: 12/28/2022 | Last Updated: 12/28/2022 | ||
==See also== | |||
*Part 1: Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues | |||
*Part 2: [[Fulton Sheriff wrongfully evicts Mother and children]] | |||
*Part 3: [[Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges]] | |||
*Part 4: [[Cobb County judge sets the record straight in Fulton, or is it all a facade?]] | |||
*Part 5: [[Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA]] | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
(username removed)