Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"

(username removed)
Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit
(username removed)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#seo:
|title=Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges
|description=Fulton County Superior Court Judges refuse to recuse and refuse to appoint a special master in quiet title case
|keywords=Fulton County corruption, Country Club of the South, Fulton County Superior Court, Melynee Leftridge, Judge Melynee Leftridge, Melynee Leftridge Harris, Judge Leftridge, Judge Melynee Leftridge Harris, Judge Rachel Krause, Fulton County, Judge Emily Richardson, Judge Shukura Ingram, 955 Tiverton Lane, 955 Tiverton Lane, wikilaw
}}
[[File:Fulton County Judicial Backscratching.png|left|300px|Judge Melynee Leftridge (top-left), Judge Emily Richardson (top-right), Judge Rachel Krause (bottom-left), Judge Shukura Ingram (bottom-right)]]
=Unchecked Power Cultivates Judicial Back-Scratching=
=Unchecked Power Cultivates Judicial Back-Scratching=
In what should have been a no-brainer recusal of a biased judge, a slew of Fulton County judges rallied behind their rogue colleague which tragically confirms the already perceived low level of integrity held by the Fulton County judiciary.
In what should have been a no-brainer recusal of a biased judge, a slew of Fulton County judges rallied behind their rogue colleague which tragically confirms the already perceived low level of integrity held by the Fulton County judiciary.
Line 6: Line 12:
<br>
<br>


Beginning in May of 2020, Jackson had been making payments toward the purchase of a home located in The Country Club of the South. As is known, home values have been skyrocketing since at least September of 2021 and, at some point amidst this modern day gold rush, the seller decided he no longer wanted Jackson to buy the home and subsequently hired a company to stage an eviction, which was inevitably botched resulting in what appears to be an array of backdoor dealings among Fulton County Superior Court Judges, the Sheriff and lawyers—or is it all just one big coincidence? Let's review the facts, and you be the judge.
Beginning in May of 2020, Jackson had been making payments toward the purchase of a home located in The Country Club of the South. As is known, home values have been skyrocketing since at least September of 2021 and, at some point amidst this modern day gold rush, the seller decided he no longer wanted Jackson to buy the home and subsequently hired a company to stage an eviction which was inevitably botched, resulting in what appears to be an array of backdoor dealings among Fulton County Superior Court Judges, the Sheriff and lawyers—or is it all just one big coincidence? Let's review the facts, and you be the judge.
<br>
<br>
==The Country Club of the South: Fulton County’s Very Own Mar-a-Lago==
==The Country Club of the South: Fulton County’s Hidden Paradise==
The situation stems from a combination of written agreements between home-sellers Arthur M. McCracken and Julie L. McCracken and home-buyer Derrick Jackson.
The situation stems from a combination of written agreements between home-sellers Arthur M. McCracken and Julie L. McCracken and home-buyer Derrick Jackson.
<br>
<br>
Line 19: Line 25:
<ref>[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-20/this-14-7-atlanta-home-with-bunker-said-to-be-safest-in-america This $14 Million Atlanta Home With Bunker Is 'Safest In America']</ref>
<ref>[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-20/this-14-7-atlanta-home-with-bunker-said-to-be-safest-in-america This $14 Million Atlanta Home With Bunker Is 'Safest In America']</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Though the McCrackens hired a property manager to execute an eviction, this was obviously not a typical landlord-tenant case—with an alleged rent of $15,000 per month after a $100,000 down payment under a Purchase and Sale Agreement. Having committed to removing Jackson as their buyer, the McCrackens’ property manager refuses to drop the case despite having failed to deliver proper legal notices before initiating the eviction (or "dispossessory") process. At the time the case was filed the real estate market was getting exponentially warmer and it appeared to be in the McCrackens’ interest to pocket Jackson’s investment and seek a new buyer. Jackson offered multiple times to simply pay off the running balance and continue with the purchase, to which the McCrackens’ attorney has repeated "Not a chance!" Clearly, it was never about rent, it was about the sale. But why?
Though the McCrackens hired a property manager to execute an eviction, this was obviously not a typical landlord-tenant case—with an alleged rent of $15,000 per month after a $100,000 down payment under a Purchase and Sale Agreement. Having committed to removing Jackson as their buyer, the McCrackens’ property manager refuses to drop the case despite having failed to deliver proper legal notices before initiating the eviction (or "dispossessory") process. At the time the case was filed, the real estate market was getting exponentially warmer and it appeared to be in the McCrackens’ interest to pocket Jackson’s investment and seek a new buyer. Jackson offered multiple times to simply pay off the running balance and continue with the purchase, to which the McCrackens’ attorney has replied "Not a chance!" Clearly, it was never about Jackson’s ability to pay rent. No, it is about the McCrackens’ desire to abandon the sale. But why?
<br>
<br>


Line 37: Line 43:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


"As an experienced landlord-tenant attorney—often times defending tenants—I have been privy to witnessing behavioral patterns of many landlord attorneys and judges that are complicit with these tactics, and it is very sad to say the least. Whether you have flat out corruption or if you have a judge who simply isn’t paying any attention to detail, it's a very scary situation." McMaster continued: "The other judges turned a blind-eye when we sought removal of Judge Leftridge and relief from what we perceived to be blatant impropriety in Jackson's case. It was almost as if they were saying 'It doesn't matter what the law says, we aren't going to remove our friend from the bench.'"
"As an experienced landlord-tenant attorney—often times defending tenants—I have been privy to witnessing behavioral patterns of many landlord attorneys and judges that are complicit with these tactics, and it is very sad to say the least. Whether you have flat out corruption or if you have a judge who simply isn’t paying any attention to detail, it's a very scary situation." McMaster continued: "The other judges turned a blind-eye when we sought removal of Judge Leftridge and relief from what we perceived to be blatant impropriety in Jackson's case. It was almost as if they were saying 'It doesn't matter what the law says, we aren't going to remove a fellow judge from the bench.'"
<br>
<br>


Line 52: Line 58:
*On May 18, 2020, Derrick Jackson entered into a Purchase And Sale Agreement with the McCrackens to buy the home for $1.8 million, depositing $100,000 in earnest money, plus rolling over $10,000 from a previous agreement with the McCrackens. At the time, Bank of America was the mortgagor to the Property and Mike McCracken, the mortgagee, was adamant that Bank of America not know about the Purchase And Sale Agreement.
*On May 18, 2020, Derrick Jackson entered into a Purchase And Sale Agreement with the McCrackens to buy the home for $1.8 million, depositing $100,000 in earnest money, plus rolling over $10,000 from a previous agreement with the McCrackens. At the time, Bank of America was the mortgagor to the Property and Mike McCracken, the mortgagee, was adamant that Bank of America not know about the Purchase And Sale Agreement.
<br>
<br>
*On May 25, 2020, Derrick Jackson gave an additional $15,000 for The Country Club of the South homeowners' membership, though Jackson later learned that the actual Club cost was only $7,500, which meant Mike McCracken misrepresented the actual costs resulting in a net profit to McCracken of $7,500 on the transaction.
*On May 25, 2020, Derrick Jackson gave an additional $15,000 for The Country Club of the South membership, though Jackson later learned that the actual Club cost was only $7,500, which meant Mike McCracken misrepresented the actual costs resulting in a net profit to McCracken of $7,500 on the transaction.
<br>
<br>
*On September 24, 2020, Jackson paid $13,957.20 in property taxes to the McCrackens.
*On September 24, 2020, Jackson paid $13,957.20 in property taxes to the McCrackens.
Line 78: Line 84:
<br>
<br>


On March 23, 2023, Derrick Jackson filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the judges (including Judge Leftridge) failed to recuse themselves from the eviction case despite conflicts, two judges (one in the eviction case and one in the Quiet Title case) refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master, whose appointment is mandated by Georgia law in the Quiet Title case. To illustrate how the circumventing of checks and balances is done by Superior Court Judges, Navigating Justice developed the following chart based on court documents in Jackson's cases highlighting the key players and their respective roles:
On March 23, 2023, Derrick Jackson filed a ''Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition'' demanding, among other things, the recusal of the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench after two of the judges (including Judge Leftridge) failed to recuse themselves from the eviction case despite conflicts, two judges (one in the eviction case and one in the Quiet Title case) refused to recuse Judge Leftridge, and three judges (including Judge Leftridge) all refused to appoint a special master, whose appointment is mandated by Georgia law in the Quiet Title case. To illustrate how the circumventing of checks and balances is done by Superior Court Judges, Navigating Justice developed the following chart based on court documents in Jackson's cases highlighting the key players and their respective roles:
*Independent (left): Jury, Special Master, and Bankruptcy Court.
<br>
 
<br>
*Superior Court Controlled (right): Judges, Sheriff, and Court Staff.
*'''Independent (left)''': Jury, Special Master, and Bankruptcy Court.
*'''Superior Court Controlled (right)''': Judges, Sheriff, and Court Staff.


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Line 117: Line 124:


The same lust for money and power that caused a lack of empathy and respect for human rights and allowed slavery in the South to once prosper is still here—though perhaps incognito.
The same lust for money and power that caused a lack of empathy and respect for human rights and allowed slavery in the South to once prosper is still here—though perhaps incognito.
<br>
<br>
By
[[File:Signature wiki law NJ.png|left|256px|Author]]<br><br>
<br>
If you are aware of similar problems in Georgia legal matters, send the details and documents here: https://navigatingjustice.org/reporting/
<br>
April 2, 2023
<br>
<br>
This article comes as a Part 3 to the previously published [[Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues]] (December 28, 2022) and [[Fulton Sheriff wrongfully evicts Mother and children]] (February 9, 2023).
==See also==
*Part 1: [[Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues]]
*Part 2: [[Fulton Sheriff wrongfully evicts Mother and children]]
*Part 3: Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges
*Part 4: [[Cobb County judge sets the record straight in Fulton, or is it all a facade?]]
*Part 5: [[Fulton Judiciary Weaponizes Project ORCA]]
=References=
<references/>
(username removed)