Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 02:47, 1 April 2023
, 02:47, 1 April 2023→The Courthouse Shell Game
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
5. The writ of possession ordering that Jackson be evicted from the Property did not include his fiance and children. However, on '''January 12, 2023''', the Fulton County Sheriff Deputies used that writ of possession to remove everyone from the Property including Jackson's fiance and children. | 5. The writ of possession ordering that Jackson be evicted from the Property did not include his fiance and children. However, on '''January 12, 2023''', the Fulton County Sheriff Deputies used that writ of possession to remove everyone from the Property including Jackson's fiance and children. | ||
6. On January 31, 2023, Jackson filed a ''Petition to Quiet Title and Breach of Contract'' against the McCrackens, which required the assigned judge to appoint a special master. That case was assigned to Judge Richardson but Judge Richardson | 6. On January 31, 2023, Jackson filed a ''Petition to Quiet Title and Complaint for Breach of Contract'' against the McCrackens, which required the assigned judge to appoint a special master. That case was assigned to Judge Richardson but Judge Richardson never appointed a special master. | ||
7. On '''February 13, 2023''', Judge Richardson voluntarily recused herself from the Quiet Title case but did NOT recuse herself from the eviction case. The Quiet Title case was re-assigned to Judge Krause upon Judge Richardson's recusal. | 7. On '''February 13, 2023''', Judge Richardson voluntarily recused herself from the Quiet Title case but did NOT recuse herself from the eviction case. The Quiet Title case was re-assigned to Judge Krause upon Judge Richardson's recusal. | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
8. Judge Krause never appointed a special master in the Quiet Title action. | 8. Judge Krause never appointed a special master in the Quiet Title action. | ||
9. On '''February 17, 2023''', Judge Richardson denied | 9. On '''February 17, 2023''', Judge Richardson denied Jackson’s motion to recuse Judge Leftridge and the eviction case was then assigned back to Judge Leftridge. Judge Krause then transferred the Quiet Title action to Judge Leftridge on February 24, 2023. | ||
10. On '''March 2, 2023''', Jackson's counsel motioned to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action. Before Judge Leftridge signed the reassignment order as required by law, she set a hearing on the McCrackens' motion trying to stay the appointment of a special master. That hearing was set to take place on | 10. On '''March 2, 2023''', Jackson's counsel motioned to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the matter was reassigned to Judge Shukura Ingram. Before Judge Leftridge signed the reassignment order as required by law, she set a hearing on the McCrackens' motion trying to stay the appointment of a special master. That hearing was set to take place on March 10, 2023 before the Honorable Judge Alford Dempsey. However, on '''March 9, 2023''', the Court canceled that hearing in light of the resusal motion pending against Judge Leftridge. | ||
11. On '''March 10, 2023''', Judge Ingram denied Jackson's motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the case was assigned back to Judge Leftridge. | 11. On '''March 10, 2023''', Judge Ingram denied Jackson's motion to recuse Judge Leftridge from the Quiet Title action and the case was assigned back to Judge Leftridge. | ||
12. After refusing to appoint a special master in the Quiet Title action and other | 12. After refusing to appoint a special master in the Quiet Title action and considering other facts giving rise to an appearance of impropriety, Jackson filed a ''Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition'' against the entire Fulton County Superior Court bench of judges. That matter is still pending. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Based on the above, the actions (or inactions) taken (or not taken) by the Fulton County Superior Court judges and their subordinates are consistent with gaining and maintaining the most control over the outcome of the case, which is inconsistent with their duty to remain neutral and impartial. If | Based on the above, the actions (or inactions) taken (or not taken) by the Fulton County Superior Court judges and their subordinates are consistent with gaining and maintaining the most control over the outcome of the case, which is inconsistent with their duty to remain neutral and impartial. If these judges were neutral and impartial, they would have no interest in preventing a special master from taking jurisdiction over the case. But they are certainly fighting hard to keep a special master from reviewing the case, VERY hard. | ||
=History Repeats Itself= | =History Repeats Itself= | ||
(username removed)