Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"

Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)

Revision as of 01:46, 1 April 2023

8 bytes removed , 01:46, 1 April 2023

→‎The Country Club of the South: Fulton County’s Very Own Mar-a-Lago

(username removed)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 <ref>[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-20/this-14-7-atlanta-home-with-bunker-said-to-be-safest-in-america This $14 Million Atlanta Home With Bunker Is 'Safest In America']</ref>
 </blockquote>
-Though the McCrackens hired a property manager to execute a "staged" eviction, this was obviously not a typical landlord-tenant case—with an alleged rent of $15,000 per month after a $100,000 down payment under a Purchase and Sale Agreement. Having committed to removing Jackson as their buyer, the McCrackens’ property manager refuses to drop the case despite having failed to deliver proper legal notices before initiating the eviction (or "dispossessory") process. At the time the case was filed the real estate market was getting exponentially warmer and it appeared to be in the McCrackens’ interest to pocket Jackson’s investment and seek a new buyer. Jackson offered multiple times to simply pay off the running balance and continue with the purchase, to which the McCrackens’ attorney has repeated "Not a chance!" Clearly, it was never about rent, it was about the sale. But why?
+Though the McCrackens hired a property manager to execute an eviction, this was obviously not a typical landlord-tenant case—with an alleged rent of $15,000 per month after a $100,000 down payment under a Purchase and Sale Agreement. Having committed to removing Jackson as their buyer, the McCrackens’ property manager refuses to drop the case despite having failed to deliver proper legal notices before initiating the eviction (or "dispossessory") process. At the time the case was filed the real estate market was getting exponentially warmer and it appeared to be in the McCrackens’ interest to pocket Jackson’s investment and seek a new buyer. Jackson offered multiple times to simply pay off the running balance and continue with the purchase, to which the McCrackens’ attorney has repeated "Not a chance!" Clearly, it was never about rent, it was about the sale. But why?
 <br>