Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 01:32, 1 April 2023
, 01:32, 1 April 2023→History Repeats Itself
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit Reverted |
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit Manual revert |
||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
=History Repeats Itself= | =History Repeats Itself= | ||
If there was ever a question as to whether a judge would recuse another judge for violating Georgia's Code of Judicial Conduct, this case has removed the matter entirely from conjecture. We can now be sure ''beyond a reasonable doubt'' that the unwritten rule amongst the fraternity of judges | If there was ever a question as to whether a judge would recuse another judge for violating Georgia's Code of Judicial Conduct, this case has removed the matter entirely from conjecture. We can now be sure ''beyond a reasonable doubt'' that the unwritten rule amongst the fraternity of judges in Fulton County supersedes Georgia’s ethics code. That unwritten rule is: '''No matter the facts and circumstances, a judge shall not remove another judge from a case.''' | ||
The same lust for money and power that caused a lack of empathy and respect for human rights and allowed slavery in the South to once prosper is still here—though perhaps incognito. | The same lust for money and power that caused a lack of empathy and respect for human rights and allowed slavery in the South to once prosper is still here—though perhaps incognito. | ||
(username removed)