Difference between revisions of "Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges"
Georgia Ethics Code Does Not Apply To Fulton Judges (view source)
Revision as of 01:10, 1 April 2023
, 01:10, 1 April 2023→It Is What It Is...
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
The above shows that the McCrackens made large asset purchases whenever Jackson paid to them substantial sums of money required by the agreements between the two parties. All the while Mike McCracken claimed that he owed Bank of America $1.8 million, which Jackson came later to find out was $300,000 more than the debt amount shown on the Security Deed for the Property (which showed $1.52 million). Bank of America, completely unaware of the of the Purchase Agreement described above, later transferred the mortgage to FirstKey Mortgage LLC in January of 2021. | The above shows that the McCrackens made large asset purchases whenever Jackson paid to them substantial sums of money required by the agreements between the two parties. All the while Mike McCracken claimed that he owed Bank of America $1.8 million, which Jackson came later to find out was $300,000 more than the debt amount shown on the Security Deed for the Property (which showed $1.52 million). Bank of America, completely unaware of the of the Purchase Agreement described above, later transferred the mortgage to FirstKey Mortgage LLC in January of 2021. | ||
All that being said, what at a glance appeared to be the result of simple greed was more likely an act of necessity. If it is true that the McCrackens cannot catch up on their mortgage (now owned by FirstKey), the McCrackens have no choice but to renege on their Purchase Agreement with Jackson and sell the property for full price to a fresh buyer, making a "staged" eviction their ONLY chance out of debt with the unsuspecting FirstKey mortgagor. And with the collective | All that being said, what at a glance appeared to be the result of simple greed was more likely an act of necessity. If it is true that the McCrackens cannot catch up on their mortgage (now owned by FirstKey), the McCrackens have no choice but to renege on their Purchase Agreement with Jackson and sell the property for full price to a fresh buyer, making a "staged" eviction their ONLY chance out of debt with the unsuspecting FirstKey mortgagor. And with the collective agenda of multiple Fulton County Superior Court judges the McCrackens may very well succeed, which would explain why Jackson wants the entire bench recused from the case. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
(username removed)