Difference between revisions of "Flournoy Train Leads Newbie Off A Cliff"
Flournoy Train Leads Newbie Off A Cliff (view source)
Revision as of 13:50, 8 July 2023
, 13:50, 8 July 2023→The Runaway Train…
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==The Runaway Train…== | ==The Runaway Train…== | ||
Staff Attorney Matt Freedman spent years under the guidance of Robert E. Flournoy III who is perhaps one of Cobb County’s most controversial Superior Court judges, not known for his integrity but well known for his poor temperament, lack of self control and sometimes incoherent rambling from the bench. Many in the legal community credit Judge Flournoy as the cause for Judge Robert D. Leonard II being challenged in the 2022 election. As the story goes, Judge Leonard refused to disqualify Judge Flournoy from presiding over a case that involved Judge Flournoy’s own attorney and campaign treasurer and, considering Judge Flournoy was not up for re-election, Judge Leonard found himself in a fight to save his job against two challengers in the 2022 Cobb County Superior Court judicial election for enabling Flournoy. | Staff Attorney Matt Freedman spent years under the guidance of Robert E. Flournoy III who is perhaps one of Cobb County’s most controversial Superior Court judges, not known for his integrity but well known for his poor temperament, lack of self control and sometimes incoherent rambling from the bench. <ref>note1</ref> Many in the legal community credit Judge Flournoy as the cause for Judge Robert D. Leonard II being challenged in the 2022 election. As the story goes, Judge Leonard refused to disqualify Judge Flournoy from presiding over a case that involved Judge Flournoy’s own attorney and campaign treasurer and, considering Judge Flournoy was not up for re-election, Judge Leonard found himself in a fight to save his job against two challengers in the 2022 Cobb County Superior Court judicial election for enabling Flournoy. | ||
In a comparable child custody case which was assigned to Judge Flournoy prior to his retirement, Judge Flournoy refused to remove a Guardian ad Litem ("GAL") from that case despite a conflict of interest between the GAL and the attorney of record for a plaintiff-father. As expected in light of the presumed bias of the GAL, the father in that case has received full custody of the child and the mother has temporarily been denied all rights despite evidence of physical abuse by the father. The attorney for the mother motioned to have the GAL removed from the case due to the conflict, yet Judge Flournoy denied that request. Though the entire case is a jumbled mess of impropriety, the fact that none of the parties to that case even reside in Cobb County is a matter of severe public concern. | In a comparable child custody case which was assigned to Judge Flournoy prior to his retirement, Judge Flournoy refused to remove a Guardian ad Litem ("GAL") from that case despite a conflict of interest between the GAL and the attorney of record for a plaintiff-father. As expected in light of the presumed bias of the GAL, the father in that case has received full custody of the child and the mother has temporarily been denied all rights despite evidence of physical abuse by the father. The attorney for the mother motioned to have the GAL removed from the case due to the conflict, yet Judge Flournoy denied that request. Though the entire case is a jumbled mess of impropriety, the fact that none of the parties to that case even reside in Cobb County is a matter of severe public concern. | ||
(username removed)