Difference between revisions of "Child endangering Cobb County judge prepares for senior judgeship"
Child endangering Cobb County judge prepares for senior judgeship (view source)
Revision as of 20:55, 2 January 2023
, 20:55, 2 January 2023no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
"Georgia’s statutory rape law does not provide a deterrent for a 43-year-old court ordered male custodian of a non-blood-related 16-year-old girl from developing a romantic relationship with that girl while in his custody," McMaster explained. "In fact, there is no protection under Georgia law for the minor child at risk discussed in 'The Lion's Den' article." | "Georgia’s statutory rape law does not provide a deterrent for a 43-year-old court ordered male custodian of a non-blood-related 16-year-old girl from developing a romantic relationship with that girl while in his custody," McMaster explained. "In fact, there is no protection under Georgia law for the minor child at risk discussed in '[[The Lion's Den]]' article." | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:LionDen.jpeg|Left|200px|The Lion's Den]] | [[File:LionDen.jpeg|Left|200px|The Lion's Den]] | ||
==Cronyism and Bullying from the Bench== | ==Cronyism and Bullying from the Bench== | ||
Perhaps Judge Flournoy’s most notorious traits are his unruly temperament on the bench and his failure to recuse himself from cases that he should not preside over. The more publicized circumstance is "The Lion's Den" case, an exert of which is as follows: | Perhaps Judge Flournoy’s most notorious traits are his unruly temperament on the bench and his failure to recuse himself from cases that he should not preside over. The more publicized circumstance is "[[The Lion's Den]]" case, an exert of which is as follows: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
(username removed)