Difference between revisions of "Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues"
Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues (view source)
Revision as of 13:18, 25 December 2022
, 13:18, 25 December 2022no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The plaintiff-landlord (client of Hall Booth Smith) requested from the court a release of all funds held in the Registry at around 5:20 PM on December 20, 2022;<ref>Motion For Writ of Possession</ref> and the judge entered the order releasing the funds without a hearing at 11:03 AM the very next morning (on December 21)<ref>Order Granting Motion</ref> with over $40,000 of those funds still in dispute for a jury to decide ownership of. “I’ve seen my fair share of malfeasance from the bench in multiple [Georgia] counties so, while this situation isn’t overly surprising, it’s still disheartening and puts me in a bad position having to ask the judge to recuse herself,” McMaster continued. “It would essentially amount to malpractice on my part if I don’t motion to recuse the judge at this point.” | The plaintiff-landlord (client of Hall Booth Smith) requested from the court a release of all funds held in the Registry at around 5:20 PM on December 20, 2022;<ref>Motion For Immediate Writ of Possession</ref> and the judge entered the order releasing the funds without a hearing at 11:03 AM the very next morning (on December 21)<ref>Order Granting Motion</ref> with over $40,000 of those funds still in dispute for a jury to decide ownership of. “I’ve seen my fair share of malfeasance from the bench in multiple [Georgia] counties so, while this situation isn’t overly surprising, it’s still disheartening and puts me in a bad position having to ask the judge to recuse herself,” McMaster continued. “It would essentially amount to malpractice on my part if I don’t motion to recuse the judge at this point.” | ||
(username removed)