Difference between revisions of "Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues"
Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues (view source)
Revision as of 12:49, 25 December 2022
, 12:49, 25 December 2022no edit summary
(username removed) |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The defendant, Derrick Jackson (represented by McMaster) had already deposited over $190,000 into the Court’s Registry before November of this year, making it mathematically impossible for the plaintiff to be entitled to all money already in the Registry and for Jackson to owe an additional $30,000 in rent through December 31. | The defendant, Derrick Jackson (represented by McMaster) had already deposited over $190,000 into the Court’s Registry before November of this year, making it mathematically impossible for the plaintiff to be entitled to all money already in the Registry and for Jackson to owe an additional $30,000 in rent through December 31. | ||
(username removed)