Difference between revisions of "Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues"
Karma prevails and Recusal Motion ensues (view source)
Revision as of 12:30, 25 December 2022
, 12:30, 25 December 2022no edit summary
(username removed) Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit |
(username removed) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
The defendant, Derrick Jackson (represented by McMaster) had already deposited over $190,000 into the Court’s Registry before November of this year, making it mathematically impossible for the plaintiff to be entitled to all money already in the Registry and for Jackson to owe an additional $30,000 in rent through December 31. | The defendant, Derrick Jackson (represented by McMaster) had already deposited over $190,000 into the Court’s Registry before November of this year, making it mathematically impossible for the plaintiff to be entitled to all money already in the Registry and for Jackson to owe an additional $30,000 in rent through December 31. | ||
As for the likelihood that this was all a mere math error by the judge, “We all know that Judge Leftridge is very detail oriented and essentially a ‘math- | |||
As for the likelihood that this was all a mere math error by the judge, “We all know that Judge Leftridge is very detail oriented and essentially a ‘math-whiz’ when she wants to be,” McMaster said admittedly in reference to Leftridge’s recent decision to reinstate Patty Durand as a candidate for the Georgia Public Service Commission, reversing Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s decision to disqualify Democrat Patty Durand from the recent election. More on that case's facts and circumstances can be found [https://georgiarecorder.com/2022/08/18/superior-court-judge-puts-echols-democratic-psc-challenger-back-on-november-ballot/ here]. | |||
(username removed)